Human study · Nutrition · 20 Sept 2026
A review of 17 hospital feeding guidelines found none written for critical illness after surgery
Source: Flinders University / EurekAlert
What the research found
Commentary (guideline review). Chen Xin, Frances Lin, and colleagues at Flinders University and Capital Medical University appraised 17 hospital nutrition guidelines in Clinical Nutrition (doi 10.1016/j.clnu.2026.106755; EurekAlert 20 September 2026). They found extensive feeding guidance for people who are critically ill, and no guideline written for critical illness after major surgery. The review says feeding support, when it is safe, often starts in the first 24 to 48 hours, preferably through the gut, with amounts that change by injury. Severe burns may need a large protein supply very early. A badly injured bowel may need tube feeding or intravenous feeding until ordinary meals are possible. The authors argue that nutrition is part of recovery, not an extra, and that teams should look for malnutrition risk early and keep rechecking it. This is a synthesis of hospital guidelines, not a home meal plan and not a trial that assigned a diet. Educational notes for care teams and families.
Evidence level: Human study. A study in people, but an association isn't proof of cause.
More nutrition news
- Eight weeks of a daily avocado and a cup of mango lined up with better blood-vessel function in 82 adults with prediabetes
- Eight months of medically tailored meals lined up with lower blood pressure and HbA1c in 110 adults with type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure
- A clinical nutrition report says potassium intake belongs beside sodium reduction for blood pressure
- In 22 elite women who play Australian rules football, in-season protein intake and fat intake were lower than in pre-season
- A diet higher in ultra-processed food tracked more depressive symptoms in older adults