VitaLonga

Health sync

Get the app. Sync HealthKit or Health Connect.

Tracker is the hub: install the VitaLonga iOS/Android app, grant Health, then scan the signed-in QR to log the phone into your member. File import stays as a fallback. Educational numbers only — not medical advice.

Longevity education

Stay curious about aging well — without pretending to be your clinician.

Read today's research headlines, run honest calculators, keep a private record, and assemble an educational supplement protocol. Not a clinic.

A couple walking a sunlit woodland path

Today's news

Newest story: 31 Oct 2026

News archive →

EurekAlert · 30 Oct 2026 · Research

People who finished a cold-shower trial reported fewer sick days in a Basel doctoral study

EurekAlert posted this on 30 October 2026. It is a University of Basel report of a doctoral project by psychologist Lena Glaser, not a peer-reviewed journal paper. The notes that agree, including Swiss and Dutch coverage of the same report, describe 719 healthy adults aged 18 to 65 who were not already taking cold showers. For 12 weeks they showered as cold as the shower allowed. A control group kept their usual showers. Dropout was high in the first two weeks and then declined, which the report treats as habituation. People who remained said they felt better. That feeling is subjective. They reported feeling unwell on 26 percent fewer days and 31 percent fewer absences from work. For a 45-liter shower, dropping the water from 40 C to 15 C saves about 1.3 kilowatt-hours. The report estimates about 15 kg of CO2 per person over 12 weeks, on the order of 100 km of driving. It is not known whether people kept the habit afterward. Sex was not reported, and the release does not split results by age, so this card is not tagged to one age band. Self-report and dropout limit the result. It does not show that cold showers prevent illness. Not medical advice.

Read at EurekAlert →♡ Save

  • study

Cell Metabolism · 30 Oct 2026 · Aging

A lab force on bone extended lifespan in older mice through a signal called PEDF

News coverage of this experiment circulated on 30 October 2026, including a Science magazine news item. The paper itself is Cell Metabolism, online 23 October 2026, DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2026.09.020. Zhimin Zhang and Xiaochun Bai at Southern Medical University, with Lu Di (Kunming Medical University) and Lu Sheng (Kunming University of Science and Technology), studied how bone senses force. The paper text says deleting the force sensor Piezo1 in osteocytes shortened median survival by 13.2 percent in male mice and 10.7 percent in female mice. A laboratory loading device, applied in mice aged 20 to 24 months for four months, extended healthspan and lifespan by 9.4 percent, or 79.5 days, in the abstract. A Southern Medical University account of the same work, dated 27 October 2026, reported average lifespan gains of 11.9 percent in females and 7.7 percent in males. Those percentages are the university figures, and they cover both sexes. PEDF is described as a force-responsive signal from bone that, in people, is associated with healthy aging. That human link is an association, not a treatment. The device is a lab tool. It is not a result about human lifespan. Not medical advice.

Read at Cell Metabolism →♡ Save

  • study

SciTechDaily · 30 Oct 2026 · Nutrition

Trials did not show that non-nutritive sweeteners raise hunger or block weight loss

SciTechDaily reported this on 30 October 2026. It is a review of trials, not a new experiment, and it is not the 2025 Neurology paper on sweeteners and thinking scores. The review is Nutrients, 21 May 2026, DOI 10.3390/nu18111647, by Cad, Finlayson, Harrold, and colleagues, drawing on the SWEET, SWITCH, and Sweet Tooth programs. In SWEET, over one year of weight maintenance, non-nutritive sweeteners were tied to slightly greater weight loss, and the gap was largest in people who stuck with them. In SWITCH, over 52 weeks, sweetener drinks versus water were tied to somewhat more weight loss, and the authors did not call that gap clinically meaningful. In Sweet Tooth, raising or lowering how sweet the food was, without a weight-loss plan, did not change weight or body composition. Sweeteners did not consistently raise hunger, cravings, or how much people ate. In SWEET, people who avoided sweeteners developed a stronger preference for sweet foods; people who kept using them did not. Glucose, insulin, cholesterol, blood pressure, and liver enzymes were mostly comparable. Some short-term replacement of sugar lowered glucose and insulin after meals. One substudy saw a modest shift in gut bacteria without worse cardiometabolic markers. The review notes that WHO guidance and UK guidance disagree, and it treats that split as observational evidence versus randomized trials. Dropout and self-report limit the results. This review does not cancel a separate observational report that tied some sweeteners to faster decline on thinking tests. Graham Finlayson, University of Leeds, said sweeteners are not a weight plan by themselves. Not medical advice.

Read at SciTechDaily →♡ Save

  • study

Daily Brief podcast

VitaLonga Daily Brief — October 31, 2026

October 31, 2026 · 17:32

All episodes →
Watch the video
Cooking a colourful, healthy meal at home

Build your protocol

A rule-based stack from your profile, calculators, and recent tracker averages — with a why for every item.

Open protocol

Your week

Activity and exercise from your synced phone, last 7 days.

Stats →

Sign in to see your steps, sleep and workouts here.

Your protocol

A rule-based supplement stack built from your record. Educational, not a prescription.

Protocol →

Sign in and fill in your record to get a stack with a reason for every line.